Japan
The date shown marks the start of Japan’s electronic payment instruments regime. The linked Financial Services Agency materials provide the statutory and implementation context.
Stablecoin infrastructure
ERPC provides the RPC connection layer that applications use to read Solana state, submit already signed transactions, and query the resulting status. Network, compute, and purpose-built engineering can be combined within the selected project scope.
A technical overview of RPC, signing, network, and reconciliation boundaries for stablecoin systems on Solana.
Regulatory context
Selected public milestones provide dated context for architecture and operating decisions. Every statement below links to a named primary source.
Sources reviewed:
The date shown marks the start of Japan’s electronic payment instruments regime. The linked Financial Services Agency materials provide the statutory and implementation context.
The date shown marks when MiCA Titles III and IV for asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens began to apply.
The date shown marks when the GENIUS Act was signed into law.
On the date shown, JPYC officially launched its yen-denominated stablecoin and issuance and redemption platform.
JPYC Inc.Official launch announcementOn the date shown, SBI Group and Startale announced limited account-based provision of JPYSC. Their announcement describes public-chain circulation as a future step subject to legal and tax readiness.
SBI GroupJPYSC launch announcementThis infrastructure overview is not legal, tax, or regulatory advice. Obligations depend on the product, jurisdiction, custody model, and participating entities.
RPC connection layer
Applications commonly use RPC to read Solana state, submit already-signed transactions, and query the resulting status. The customer-controlled wallet or signer retains the private keys and creates the transaction signature. ERPC forwards the already-signed transaction request to Solana RPC infrastructure and returns the network response. The customer system determines how to monitor confirmation and reconcile its own business state.
RPC is one application-facing connection path; validators, indexers, and private transaction paths may also be part of a system. ERPC does not hold customer private keys, create customer signatures, or decide how the customer records the result.
Transaction journey
The five stages separate application logic, customer-controlled signing, RPC transport, Solana processing, and confirmation and reconciliation in the customer system.
The application reads the Solana state needed to construct a payment and prepares the transaction instructions.
Within the customer-controlled security boundary, the wallet or signer builds and signs the transaction. Private keys are not passed to ERPC.
ERPC forwards the already-signed transaction request to Solana RPC infrastructure and returns the network response.
The Solana network processes the transaction according to current network state and protocol rules.
The customer system queries the resulting status, decides how to monitor confirmation, and reconciles its own application and business state.
In this journey, ERPC carries state queries, already-signed transaction submissions, and resulting-status queries. Signing, confirmation policy, and business reconciliation remain within customer-controlled systems.
The legal roles of all parties depend on the arrangement and jurisdiction and require separate legal analysis.
Operational use cases
These are representative integration patterns, not customer or regulated-service claims. Product policy, signing, compliance, and reconciliation remain with the customer or partner.
01
The application constructs the payment, the customer authorizes and signs it, and the merchant system maps the observed network result to the order.
02
Customer systems can submit signed transactions for settlement, payouts, or treasury workflows and reconcile the results with invoices, approvals, and internal books.
03
Clients and servers can exchange x402 payment requirements and scheme- and network-specific PaymentPayloads. This HTTP payment flow is separate from the general application journey; on Solana’s exact scheme, the payload can contain a serialized, partially signed payment transaction for verification and settlement.
04
Integrations can map RPC responses and later status queries to order, ledger, or ERP records while the customer retains the reconciliation rules.
x402 and API payments
x402 is an HTTP payment protocol, not a stablecoin or wallet. It defines how a server states payment requirements and how a client returns a payment payload before the server provides a resource.
The x402 PaymentPayload is specific to the selected scheme and network. For Solana’s exact scheme, it can contain a serialized, partially signed Solana payment transaction for verification and settlement.
A client requests a paid HTTP resource or API operation from the server.
The server responds with 402 Payment Required and the payment requirements it accepts.
The client creates the signed x402 API payment payload and sends it with a new request.
The server or facilitator verifies the payload and performs the settlement defined by the protocol.
After verification and settlement, the server returns the resource and the available settlement result.
Responsibility boundaries
The architecture separates customer-controlled product and compliance decisions, the contracted ERPC scope, and transaction processing on Solana.
The customer or partner defines product policy, application behavior, wallet and signing controls, compliance and identity processes, accounting, and reconciliation rules.
Within the contracted scope, ERPC can provide shared or dedicated RPC, network connectivity, selected VPS or bare-metal infrastructure, and purpose-built engineering. ERPC does not custody customer private keys or sign customer application transactions.
Solana processes submitted transactions and maintains network ledger state according to its protocol rules.
This technical map does not assign ERPC or any other party the role of issuer, custodian, exchange, broker, payment intermediary, or end-user wallet. Legal roles depend on the arrangement and jurisdiction and require separate legal analysis.
First-party evidence
The RPC, documentation, VPS, and bare-metal surfaces below document the public components available for architecture review. The contracted scope determines which components apply.
Review the RPC product surface against the application’s required state queries, signed transaction submissions, and status queries.
View RPC servicesUse the documentation to review methods, parameters, error responses, and integration boundaries.
Read RPC documentationReview VPS options when customer-operated services or integration components are included in the selected scope.
View VPS optionsReview bare-metal options when the customer needs to plan the physical server environment as a separate infrastructure decision.
View bare-metal optionsEnterprise inquiry
Discuss the RPC requirements, customer-controlled signing boundary, status and reconciliation workflow, and any network or compute components in the selected scope.